DETAILED NOTES ON CASE LAWS ON PARTNERSHIP ACT

Detailed Notes on case laws on partnership act

Detailed Notes on case laws on partnership act

Blog Article

Google Scholar – a vast database of state and federal case law, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.

For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which change depending to the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case law citation inside of a state court is probably not appropriate, or perhaps accepted, at the U.

fourteen. Within the light of the position explained over, it's concluded that a civil servant contains a fundamental right for being promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be thought of for no fault of his possess and meanwhile he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency from the duration of service or during the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, along with the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release for a legally recognized conviction. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found being not maintainable and is dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may seek out remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

To the foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order regarding cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more

PLR can be a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :

eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this can be a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major he / she can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents with the boy or Woman never approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they will do if they might Minimize off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who is major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who gives these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to job by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by legislation.

The DCFS social worker in charge in the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her 6-thirty here day period report towards the court, the worker elaborated over the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

Are you currently looking for Court Information? You should utilize our site to search for a case or search for the person. Information on the site is updated every 24 hours at three:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found over the search site is provided to be used as reference material and isn't the official court record.

This page contains slip opinions. Slip opinions will be the opinions that are filed over the day that the appellate court issues its decision and are often not the court's final opinion.

Any court may seek out to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to succeed in a different summary. The validity of such a distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to some higher court.

17 . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have read the learned counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues from the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(one) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession of the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to get decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has got to see this component for interim custody of the subject premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming towards the main case, Additionally it is a very well-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject matter into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.

Report this page